Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) on Monday said direct spectrum allocation to enterprises is not tenable in India as the industry body of telcos cited cost burden, regulatory parity and security-related concerns to back its arguments.
COAI advocated that all enterprise 5G needs must be fulfilled through licensed Telecom Service Providers (TSPs) through spectrum leasing or network slicing, as this would ensure national security, revenue protection and regulatory balance in a rapidly evolving ecosystem.
The association of telecom operators, including Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea, believes that direct spectrum allocation to enterprises is not tenable in India because of various reasons pertaining to India's telecom ecosystem, the national revenue, as well as security architecture.
Noting that some industry bodies have "in their own interests" drawn parallels with countries such as the US, Finland, Germany and the UK, where private networks have been deployed, COAI emphasised that such a comparison ignores a crucial contextual difference of such industries being located in remote or geographically secluded areas with limited public network coverage.
In India, however, most industrial corridors and enterprise zones are already well-served by telecom operators, thereby leaving no coverage deficit, SP Kochhar, Director General of COAI said in a statement.
To say that setting up private networks independently would be cheaper for enterprises is "misleading", COAI asserted.
It said, in reality, deploying a private 5G network entails significant capital expenditure on equipment, spectrum management, security, network maintenance and skilled personnel.
"Unlike TSPs, most enterprises do not have the expertise or scale to manage telecom infrastructure efficiently. What appears cheaper on paper could turn out to be more expensive and operationally burdensome in practice," according to it.
Moreover, with continuous upgrades and evolution of both the technology as well as the ecosystem, there would be a need for continuous upgradation to the network components in the private network, which the telecom operators would be in the most favourable position to know and deploy suitably.
"It is also misleading to claim that telcos would not be technically equipped to provide for the private networks, as with the provisions of 5G, knowledge of the requisite SLAs and the provision of Network Slicing put together, the telcos are in a better position to provide the services along with the knowledge and experience required to run the same on a long-term basis," it said.
The association further said that radio frequencies cannot be geographically or physically contained and hence, signals from private networks can spill over beyond the intended premises, leading to interference with public mobile networks operated by licensed TSPs, creating risks in network reliability, service quality and user experience on both sides.
This could be well managed by a telecom operator.
Besides, one must consider the significant loss to the government exchequer in case of private networks, as the national auction of spectrum generated Rs 1.5 lakh crore in 2022 alone, it observed.
COAI also cited "uneven playing field" between operators and private entities that enjoy infrastructure benefits without comparable regulatory or financial obligations.
"Above all, COAI firmly believes that the private networks managed by unlicensed or foreign entities raise serious national security concerns as these players are not bound by the same compliance, interception and regulatory obligations as TSPs," COAI said.
Without a clear regulatory framework, there would be no accountability in case of misuse, breach or attack. Such an arrangement would also dilute the state's ability to ensure lawful interception, user traceability and emergency response coordination.
It said that without robust domestic oversight, this could expose India to cybersecurity, surveillance and diplomatic risks and set a dangerous precedent of allowing private service delivery without appropriate safeguards, investments or responsibilities.
"The future of India's digital economy must be built on secure, inclusive and accountable networks, and Indian Telecom Service Providers stand ready to deliver private 5G solutions under appropriate regulatory supervision," COAI said. PTI
COAI advocated that all enterprise 5G needs must be fulfilled through licensed Telecom Service Providers (TSPs) through spectrum leasing or network slicing, as this would ensure national security, revenue protection and regulatory balance in a rapidly evolving ecosystem.
The association of telecom operators, including Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea, believes that direct spectrum allocation to enterprises is not tenable in India because of various reasons pertaining to India's telecom ecosystem, the national revenue, as well as security architecture.
Noting that some industry bodies have "in their own interests" drawn parallels with countries such as the US, Finland, Germany and the UK, where private networks have been deployed, COAI emphasised that such a comparison ignores a crucial contextual difference of such industries being located in remote or geographically secluded areas with limited public network coverage.
In India, however, most industrial corridors and enterprise zones are already well-served by telecom operators, thereby leaving no coverage deficit, SP Kochhar, Director General of COAI said in a statement.
To say that setting up private networks independently would be cheaper for enterprises is "misleading", COAI asserted.
It said, in reality, deploying a private 5G network entails significant capital expenditure on equipment, spectrum management, security, network maintenance and skilled personnel.
"Unlike TSPs, most enterprises do not have the expertise or scale to manage telecom infrastructure efficiently. What appears cheaper on paper could turn out to be more expensive and operationally burdensome in practice," according to it.
Moreover, with continuous upgrades and evolution of both the technology as well as the ecosystem, there would be a need for continuous upgradation to the network components in the private network, which the telecom operators would be in the most favourable position to know and deploy suitably.
"It is also misleading to claim that telcos would not be technically equipped to provide for the private networks, as with the provisions of 5G, knowledge of the requisite SLAs and the provision of Network Slicing put together, the telcos are in a better position to provide the services along with the knowledge and experience required to run the same on a long-term basis," it said.
The association further said that radio frequencies cannot be geographically or physically contained and hence, signals from private networks can spill over beyond the intended premises, leading to interference with public mobile networks operated by licensed TSPs, creating risks in network reliability, service quality and user experience on both sides.
This could be well managed by a telecom operator.
Besides, one must consider the significant loss to the government exchequer in case of private networks, as the national auction of spectrum generated Rs 1.5 lakh crore in 2022 alone, it observed.
COAI also cited "uneven playing field" between operators and private entities that enjoy infrastructure benefits without comparable regulatory or financial obligations.
"Above all, COAI firmly believes that the private networks managed by unlicensed or foreign entities raise serious national security concerns as these players are not bound by the same compliance, interception and regulatory obligations as TSPs," COAI said.
Without a clear regulatory framework, there would be no accountability in case of misuse, breach or attack. Such an arrangement would also dilute the state's ability to ensure lawful interception, user traceability and emergency response coordination.
It said that without robust domestic oversight, this could expose India to cybersecurity, surveillance and diplomatic risks and set a dangerous precedent of allowing private service delivery without appropriate safeguards, investments or responsibilities.
"The future of India's digital economy must be built on secure, inclusive and accountable networks, and Indian Telecom Service Providers stand ready to deliver private 5G solutions under appropriate regulatory supervision," COAI said. PTI
You may also like
'Imagine if Biden had said this': Trump trolled for 'I'm going to Russia' slip-up; 'Alaska's going back...'
Kotak Mahindra Bank Partners with Jyoti CNC to Empower MSMEs with Tailored Equipment Financing Solutions
BJP legislator files complaint against Kolkata Police Commissioner for 'disrespecting Tricolour'
Man staggered by standby cost of two appliances after measuring everything in house
Historic UK village pub closes for good after 400 years
