'All hell could break loose' - Man City 115 charges update and Premier League warning

Manchester City appear close than ever to finding out the verdict of their Premier League charges case. The outcome could even emerge during the November international break.

Man City have been embroiled in a lengthy legal battle, facing 115 alleged breaches of league rules. Their exhaustive hearing kicked off in mid-September last year, and as we approach its first anniversary in early December, there is a growing belief that a ruling may be announced sooner, potentially during the upcoming international break next month. That will notably be the last time Premier League football takes a proper breather this season until the next hiatus in March.

According to the i Paper, a source familiar with arbitration cases has suggested that legal experts are gearing up for a mid-November verdict.

The paper also cites a source who suggests that the impending votes on financial fair play, slated for later next month, could be "totally overshadowed" by the case. Several figures at Premier League clubs reportedly believe a decision will materialise by the end of this year at the latest.

Furthermore, they quote a source who warned: "It's gone very quiet and because it's been going on for so long it's almost been forgotten about, but all hell could break loose when it lands."

The report unveils that a staggering 250,000 documents could form part of the case.

Legal experts reportedly operate on the principle that for every week a hearing continues, four weeks of deliberation are necessary.

As outlined in the report, this proved accurate for Everton's initial profitability and sustainability case, which lasted five days. Applying this formula to Man City's charges, their purported 12-week case would require 48 weeks, positioning the outcome in early November.

Earlier this month, Stefan Borson, former legal adviser to Man City, told talkSPORT: "I think the simple reality is that neither party, as of the end of last week, has had the decision of the panel. This is not a case where they've both had the decision and the sort of negotiations and settlement discussions going on in the background. It's very, very simple. They have not had the decision of the panel as of yet.

"I do think now there's no real excuse for a further delay. Even if they were busy on other matters, and they would have been, then I think it would be really quite extraordinary that there's been no timetable set with them and no arrangement set with them in terms of the payment of their time over these last ten months to produce the decision.

"I think on any basis, ten months is enough to produce even a very, very detailed 400 or 500-page decision on this case, and I think it is imminent. I know I have said that before multiple times in this room, but I did think that there was a very good chance that it would have come out for this international window. I think there's a very good chance it will come out in the next international window, and I really can't see it going into 2026. I just cannot see it extending beyond the year. I think it is almost out.

"Why has it not dropped into those inboxes as of yet? I don't know; it may well have done, in the last 24 hours, but certainly as of the end of last week, it was not a case of secret discussions or secret settlement discussions. It's just very, very simple. They had not received the decision."